JuergensSandbox

The new EVLA correlator is extremely powerful in its spectral capabilities. Up to 4 million channels can be observed with a spectral resolution in the Hz regime. Here is a guide to access that spectral line power.

Observation Planning

The wide bands of the EVLA allow users to observe up to 8GHz spectral bandwidth at a time. This will result in extreme continuum sensitivity. In addition, it opens up the possibility to observe one or more spectral lines at a given time. So the first to is to carefully plan the observations.

There are a number of online tools available that help spectral line observers. To start with, the rest frequency of the sopectral line needs to be determined. This can be done with Splatalogue which contains data from the Lovas catalog, the JPL/NASA molecular database], the Cologne Database for Molecular Spectroscopy and others. Note that in addition to molecular line transitions, splatalogue also contains radio recombination lines.

Observing Frequency and Velocity Definitions

The first step is to determine the observing frequency $\nu$ of the spectral line. This is derived from the radial velocity $v$ of the source and the rest frequency $\nu _{0}$ of the spectral line.

A full relativistic calculation shows that the velocity $v$ is determined via $v={\frac {\nu _{0}^{2}-\nu ^{2}}{\nu _{0}^{2}+\nu ^{2}}}$. This is called the relativistic velocity. This equation is a bit cumbersome to use and in astronomy to different approximations are typically used instead:

• Optical Velocity $v^{optical}={\frac {\lambda _{0}-\lambda }{\lambda _{0}}}\,\,c=cz$ ($z$ is the redshift of the source)

• Radio Velocity $v^{radio}={\frac {\nu -\nu _{0}}{\nu _{0}}}\,\,c={\frac {\lambda _{0}-\lambda }{\lambda }}\,\,c\neq v^{optical}$

The radio and optical velocities are not identical. At low velocities that difference is small but $v^{optical}$ and $v^{radio}$ diverge more and more for large values.

At significant redshifts, it is possible to place the zero point of the velocity frame into the source via

$\nu ={\frac {\nu _{0}}{z+1}}$

The redshifted $\nu$ can now be used as the input rest frequency for the observations. The velocites that are derived based on such a redshifted rest frequency will then also be correctly scaled for the spread of the velocity scale that is due to the redshift.

Velocity Frames

The earth rotates, revolves around the sun, rotates around the galaxy, moves within the Local Group, and shows motion against the cosmic microwave background. If one measures a veloocity is is therefore necessary to correct for such motions and define the frame to which the velocities are measured to.

There are various rest frames which might be appropriate. The following table lists their name, the motion for which one has to correct in order to reduce an observed velocity to that particular rest frame, and the magnitude of the velocity correction. Each subsequent rest frame is obtained by adding the effects of the preceding ones:

Rest Frame Name	Rest Frame	Correct for	Max amplitude [km/s]
Topocentric	Telescope	Nothing	0
Geocentric	Earth Center	Earth rotation	0.5
Earth-Moon Barycentric	Earth+Moon center of mass	Motion around Earth+Moon center of mass	0.013
Heliocentric	Center of the Sun	Earth oribtal motion	30
Barycentric	Earth+Sun center of mass	Earth+Sun center of mass	0.012
Local Standard of Rest (LSR)	Center of Mass of local stars	Solar motion relative to nearby stars	20
Galactocentric	Center of Milky Way	Milky Way Rotation	230
Local Group Barycentric	Local Group center of mass	Milky Way Motion	100
Virgocentric	Center of the Local Virgo supercluster	Local Group motion	300
Cosmic Microwave Background	CMB	Local Supercluster Motion	600

The velocity frame should be chosen to what is appropriate for the science. Three frames are commonly used:

• Topocentric this is the frame that the sky (observing frequency) uses. It is also the standard for visibilities in the measurement set

• Local Standard of Rest is the native output of images in CASA. Note that there are two varieties of LSR: the kinematic LSR (LSRK) and the dynamic (LSRD) definitions for the kinematic and dynamic centers, respectively. The standard used in almost all cases is LSRK and most likely the older LSR naming is identical to the mode modern LSRK definition.

• Barycentric is a common frame, too and has virtually replaced the older heliocentric standard. Given the small difference between them, they were frequently used interchangeably.

A full list of reference frames that CASA supports is provided in the CASA reference Manual and Cookbook and also on the casaguides.nrao.edu webpage The most commonly used rest frames are heliocentric (to be precise, barycentric is used at the VLA) and local standard of rest (LSR). LSR is generally used in Galactic astronomy and heliocentric in extragalactic astronomy, although the latter is often reduced to galactocentric.

Doppler Correction

A telescope operates typical at a fixed sky frequency (Topocentric velocity frame). Any spectral line will thus shift during a typical observation campaign. Within a single observation, the rotation of the earth dominates and the line may shift up to ~0.5 km/s (see above). observing campaigns that span longer times, may see spectral lines to shift in frequency by up to 30km/s due to the earth motion around the sun.

Side note: As a rule of thumb, 1 MHz in frequency corresponds to $x$ km/s for the line at a wavelegth of $x$ in mm. E.g. At a wavelength of 7mm, 1 MHz corresponds to about 7 km/s in velocity.

Using this rule of thumb, a line may shift about up to 5MHz in Q-band and up to 0.15MHz in L-band over the course of a year. This needs to be taken into account when setting up the observations. There are different ways to do this:

• use the same sky frequency for all observations. The shift of the line is accommodated by a wide bandwidth that covers the line and its width at any time of the observation campaign. The data is later regridded in CASA to a common LSRK or BARY velocity frame.

• calculate a different, but fixed sky frequency for each observation. This is called Doppler Setting and offered by OPT (currently only in OSRO mode). The line shift is then minimized to the rotation of the earth (0.5 km/s max). This small shift is corrected again by post processing.

• change the sky frequency continuously to keep the line at the same position in the band. This is called Doppler tracking and was standard for the VLA. The EVLA does NOT support Doppler tracking. The WIDAR correlator offers enough bandwidth and spectral channels to cover any line shift and post-processing regridding needs. A non-variable sky frequency delivers also a more robust calibration and system stability.

The post-processing regridding of the line in CASA can be either done directly during imaging in the task clean, or alternatively with the task cvel. This will require that spectral features need to be sampled with at least 4 channels to be correctly reproduced.

Gibbs Phenomenon and Hanning smoothing

For very sharp features, a Fourier transform can prominently display a sinc function, a channel by channel fluctuation of the amplitude. If this is apparent in the data, smoothing adjacent channels will reduce or even eliminate the effect. The smoothing kernel to be used is a Hanning smoothing function which sports a triangular kernel with the central channel being weigthed by 0.5 and the two adjacent channels by 0.25. After Hanning smoothing, however, the channels are not independent anymore and one can eliminate every other channel without losing signal to noise.

In the VLA days, the correlator design could show the Gibbs phenomenon relatively prominently and frequently Hanning smoohting was applied online during the observations to accommodate for the effect and to save disk space. The Gibbs phenomenon is much less common for the EVLA due to a better correlator design of WIDAR. Only very strong maser or rfi sources may exhibit the typical "ringing" feature of the Gibbs phenomenon. In addition, data can be stored rather cheaply so there's no need for data size reduction via Hanning smoothing anymore. As a consequence, the EVLA does not support online Hanning smoothing. If Hanning smoothing is required, it has to be performed in post-processing, e.g. with the CASA task hanningsmooth.

Correlator Setup

The WIDAR correlator at the EVLA is very flexible and provides a number of setup options that are relevant for spectral line observing.

Let's start with the basics: A signal from the telescope enters the WIDAR and during that path, it is passing analog filters that define the basebands. The basebands are the most fundamental spectral ranges for any observations with WIDAR. In the 8-bit mode, WIDAR features two independably tuneable basebands with 1 GHz bandwidth each.

As a second step, the basebands enter digital filters, 128MHz wide, the fundamental subbands.

<img src="https://docs.google.com/drawings/pub?id=1AJjdtrFNRvddyPqyvoJz9EALmBzDlgFPw4-Yu-u2qmc&w=960&h=720">

The OPT

spectral line setup

- planning - PST - OPT - exposure calculator

- OPT preparation and setup

 . suckouts
 . filters
 . tuneability of subbands
 . channels full/dual/single pol
 . baselineboard stacking
 . recirculation
 . gapfree setups
 . data rate considerations
 . setups with variable bandwidths

- bandpass

- post processing - hanning smoothing - velocity systems - continuum subtraction

Spectral Line Observing

Current->Revised OSS Guidelines

• An Overview of the EVLA

(last paragraph) The EVLA correlator will be extremely powerful and flexible. Details of the correlator configurations being offered for EVLA early science during the period Sep 2011 - Dec 012 (a full D→A configuration cycle) are described in Correlator Configurations. It is important to realise that the EVLA correlator is fundamentally a spectral line correlator. The days of separate “continuum” and “spectral line” modes of the VLA correlator are over, and all observations with the EVLA will be “spectral line.” This has implications for how observations are set up, and users who may be used to continuum observing with the VLA are strongly advised to consult Correlator Configurations.

• Limitations on Imaging Performance

(Sidelobes from Strong Sources) An extension of the previous section is to very strong sources located anywhere in the sky, such as the Sun (especially when a flare is active), or when observing with a few tens of degrees of the very strong sources Cygnus A and Casseopeia A. Image degradation is especially notable at lower frequencies, shorter configurations, and when using narrow-bandwidth observations (especially in spectral line work) where chromatic aberration cannot be utilized to reduce the disturbances. In general, the only relief is to include the disturbing sources in the imaging, or to observe when these objects are not in the viewable hemisphere.

• Correlator Configurations

All observations with the EVLA correlator should be treated as traditional VLA spectral line observations, in that they will require observation of a bandpass calibrator. They may also require observation of a delay calibrator. Users should contact NRAO staff for advice on setting up observations with the EVLA correlator.

Detailed Guidelines

Observing Preparation Recommendations

Scheduling

Calibration Strategy

• Bandpass Setup

All observations with the EVLA---even those with the goal of observing continuum---require bandpass calibration. A bandpass calibrator should be bright enough, or observed long enough, so that the bandpass calibration does not significantly contribute to the noise in the image. This implies that, for a bandpass calibrator with flux density S_cal observed for a time t_cal and a science target with flux density S_obj observed for a time t_obj, $S_{cal}{\sqrt {t_{cal}}}$ should be greater than $S_{obj}{\sqrt {t_{obj}}}$. How many times greater will be determined by one's science goals and the practicalities of the observations, but $S_{cal}{\sqrt {t_{cal}}}$ should be greater by at least a factor of two.

The bandpass calibrator should also be a point source or have a well-known model. At low frequencies, the absolute flux density calibrators (3C48, 3C147, or 3C286) are quite bright and in many cases can double as the bandpass calibrator. However, at high frequencies, these sources have only moderate flux densities of ~0.5--3 Jy, translating into a potentially noisy bandpass solution.

The stability of bandpasses as a function of time is of concern for high-dynamic-range spectral work. We have found that most antennas show bandpasses that are stable to a few (~2--4) parts in a thousand over a period of several (~4--8) hours [L BAND?].

Dramatic jumps in the bandpass structure (of order a few parts in a hundred) can occur at attenuator changes. The observer can track down such attenuator changes in their data using the switched power information; the On - Off power ('PDIF' in AIPS) wil show a clear discontinuity. For this reason, it behooves the spectral line observer to observe a bandpass calibrator at least twice during their observations. Multiple observations will provide a check that all is well on most antennas and a mechanism for identifying any "problem" antennas. However, we do not expect that interpolating in time between consecutive bandpass solutions will bear much fruit for the observer. The low-level variations observed on some antennas tend to not be smooth functions of time and will likely not be corrected with interpolation.

If there is only one observation of the bandpass calibrator, the observer should be careful to minimize the number of shadowed antennas, as an antenna without a bandpass determined for it will essentially be flagged for the rest of the observation.

Monitoring Observations

Post-processing Guidelines